Benchmarked: Ubuntu vs Vista vs Windows 7


In depth: A lot of people have been chattering about the improvements Windows 7 brings for Windows users, but how does it compare to Ubuntu in real-world tests? We put Ubuntu 8.10, Windows Vista and Windows 7 through their paces in both 32-bit and 64-bit tests to see just how well Ubuntu faces the new contender. And, just for luck, we threw in a few tests using Jaunty Jackalope with ext4.

When Windows users say that Windows 7 is easier to install than ever, what do they really mean? When they say it's faster, is it just in their heads, or is Microsoft really making big strides forward? And, perhaps most importantly, when Linux benchmarkers show us how screamingly fast ext4 is compared to ext3, how well do those figures actually transfer to end users?

These are the questions we wanted to answer, so we asked Dell to provide us with a high-spec machine to give all the operating systems room to perform to their max. Our test machine packed an Intel Core i7 920, which in layman's terms has four cores running at 2.67GHz with hyperthreading and 8MB of L3 cache. It also had 6GB of RAM, plus two 500GB of hard drives with 16MB of cache.

The tests we wanted to perform for each operating system were:

  • How long does each operating system take to install?
  • How much disk space was used in the standard install?
  • How long does boot up and shutdown take?
  • How long does it take to copy files from USB to HD, and from HD to HD?
  • How fast can it execute the Richards benchmark?

We also, just for the heck of it, kept track of how many mouse clicks it took to install each OS.

Before we jump into the results, there are a few things we should make clear:

  • To ensure absolute fairness, install time was measured from the moment the computer was turned on until we reached a working desktop.
  • The same computer hardware was used for all tests, and all operating systems were installed fresh for this article.
  • We used the Ultimate versions of Windows Vista and Windows 7, simply because Windows 7 was provided only in this flavour.
  • We used the Windows Vista SP1 disk to accurately reflect what users are likely to experience todaay.
  • Our Windows 7 version is the open beta that Microsoft issued recently. It is probable Windows 7 will be at least this fast in the final build, if not faster.
  • For Ubuntu 9.04 we used the daily build from January 22nd.
  • All operating systems were installed using standard options; nothing was changed.
  • After checking how much space was used during the initial install, each operating system was updated with all available patches before any other tests were performed.
  • Our journalistic friends have informed us that Windows Vista (and, presumably, Windows 7 too) has technology to increase the speed of the system over time as it learns to cache programs intelligently. It also allows users to use flash drives to act as temporary storage to boost speed further. None of our tests are likely to show this technology in action, so please take that into account when reading the results.
  • The filesystem, boot, shutdown and Richards benchmarks were performed three times each then averaged.

And, of course, there's the most important proviso of all: it is very, very likely that a few tweaks to any of these operating systems could have made a big difference to these results, but we're not too interested in that - these results reflect what you get you install a plain vanilla OS, like most users do.

Install time

Amount of time taken to install, from machine being turned on to working desktop. Measured in seconds; less is better.

At first glance, you might think that Ubuntu clearly installs far faster than either version of Windows, and while that's true there is one important mitigation: both Windows Vista and Windows 7 run system benchmarks part-way through the installation to determine the computer's capabilities.

A bit of a flippant one - just how many mouse clicks does it take to install an OS with the default options?

Surprisingly, Ubuntu 8.10 gets it done with half the clicks of Windows 7. NB: hopefully it's clear this doesn't make Ubuntu 8.04 twice as easy to install. Measured in, er, mouse clicks; fewer is better.

Disk space used immediately after a fresh install. Measured in gigabytes; less is better.

While some people might complain that we used the Ultimate editions of both Vista and Windows 7, they probably forget that the standard Ubuntu includes software such as an office suite as standard. NB: Vista failed to detect the network card during install, leaving us without an internet connection until a driver was downloaded on another computer.

Bootup and shutdown

Boot up time was also measured from the moment the machine was turned on, and the timer was stopped as soon as the desktop was reached. The Dell box does take about 20 seconds to get past POST, but to avoid questions about when to start the timer we just started it as soon as the power button was pressed.

Amount of time taken to boot, from machine being turned on to working desktop. Measured in seconds; less is better.

The 32-bit version of Windows 7 is the only one to beat the one-minute mark, but that advantage is quickly lost in the switch to 64-bit. Linux has always been rather slow to boot, but as we understand it reducing boot time is one of the goals of the Ubuntu 9.04 release.

Amount of time taken to shutdown, from button being clicked to machine powering off. Measured in seconds; less is better.

Windows lags a little behind the Linuxes, with 64-bit again proving a sticking point - this time for Windows Vista.

IO testing

To test filesystem performance, we ran four tests: copying large files from USB to HD, copying large files from HD to HD, copying small files from USB to HD, and copying small files from HD to HD. The HD to HD tests copied data from one part of the disk to another as opposed to copying to a different disk. For reference, the large file test comprised 39 files in 1 folder, making 399MB in total; the small file test comprised 2,154 files in 127 folders, making 603MB in total. Each of these tests were done with write caching disabled to ensure the full write had taken place.

Amount of time taken to copy the small files from a USB flash drive to hard disk. Measured in seconds; less is better.

Amount of time taken to copy the small files from one place to another on a single hard disk. Measured in seconds; less is better.

Let us take this opportunity to remind readers that Windows 7 is still at least nine months from release.

Amount of time taken to copy the large files from a USB flash drive to hard disk. Measured in seconds; less is better.

Amount of time taken to copy the large files from one place to another on a single hard disk. Measured in seconds; less is better.

With the exception of Windows 7 while copying larges files around a hard drive, Windows generally suffered compared to Linux in all of these tests. Obviously Windows does have to worry about some things that Linux doesn't, namely DRM checks, but these figures show a drastic performance difference between the two.

Notes: Vista and Windows 7 really seemed to struggle with copying lots of small files, but clearly it's something more than a dodgy driver because some of the large-file speeds are incredible in Windows 7.

Both Vista and Windows 7 seemed to introduce random delays when deleting files. For example, about one in three times when deleting the files from our filesystem benchmark, this screen below would appear and do nothing for 25-30 seconds before suddenly springing into action and deleting the files. However, this wasn't part of our benchmark, so isn't included in the numbers above.

This was very annoying.

Richards benchmark

Notes: This was done using the cross-platform Python port of Richards. For reference, Ubuntu 8.10 uses Python 2.5.2, Ubuntu 9.04 uses Python 2.5.4, and we used Python 2.5.4 on the Windows tests. Even though the 64-bit results for Linux and Windows don't look that far apart, we have to admit to being very impressed with the Windows tests - the deviation between tests was just 3ms on Vista, and 5ms on Windows 7, compared to 20ms on Linux.

Amount of time taken to execute the Python Richards benchmark. Measured in milliseconds; less is better.

It's clear from that graph that having a 64-bit OS can make a real difference in compute-intensive tasks, but it's not too pleasing to see Windows pip Linux to the post in nearly all results.

Switching to ext4

All the Linux benchmarks above were done using ext3, so what happens when we switch to ext4? Well, not a lot:

Boot, shutdown and filesystem tests for Ubuntu 9.04/x86-64 using ext3 (blue) and ext4 (red). Measured in seconds; less is better.

Although there's no difference in shutdown speed, the boot time using ext4 dropped by 8 seconds, which is a fair improvement. We can probably discount the the USB to HD tests simply out of error margin, which leaves the HD to HD tests, and there we find a very healthy boost: 3.7 seconds were shaved off the small files test, making ext4 about 25% faster. Our tests also showed an improvement in the large file test, but it's not as marked.


Benchmarks are always plagued with questions, uncertainties, error margins and other complexities, which is why we're not going to try to look too deeply into these figures. Obviously we're Linux users ourselves, but our tests have shown that there are some places where Windows 7 really is making some improvement and that's good for competition in the long term. However, Linux isn't sitting still: with ext4 now stable we expect it to be adopted into distros fairly quickly. Sadly it looks like Ubuntu 9.04 won't be among the first distros to make the switch, so users looking to get the best performance from their Linux boxes will either have to fiddle with the default options, have patience, or jump ship to Fedora - which will be switching to ext4 in the next release..

You should follow us on or Twitter

Your comments

Final Benchmark Test is Economics

Being new to Ubuntu I am totally amazed at the bottom line test to the average web surfer like me - ECONOMICS. My hard drive died this week and like most folks we use our PC for just about everything - fortunately I had backed up my files just two weeks ago to an external hard drive. My son, a big Linux fan, cautioned me not to panic but to simply replace the laptop hard-drive and install Kubuntu 11.10 (for FREE) instead of Windows (for $199.00 at Best Buy). Although I had backed up my files I didn't have a boot disc and was looking at having to purchase the latest version of Windows at my local Best Buy store (Dec 2011). I contacted a local PC repair shop and had them burn me a copy of Linux. Instead of Kubuntu 11.10 they gave me Ubuntu 11.4. The installation couldn't have been easier. As soon as the installation completed, I was prompted to install the latest version (Ubuntu 11.10). I am totally amazed at the bottom line - Instead of having to purchase a new PC for $400.00 I got by with a new 320 Gig hard-drive ($89 at Best Buy) and Ubuntu 11.10 for FREE. That's the final benchmark for the average family.

Linux on the desktop is a

Linux on the desktop is a joke, It's only free if your time is free. For people doing any serious work (im not talking about writing a letter to grandma or doing a spreadsheet for a school project) Linux is really not an option, you pretty much have to be using either Windows or OSX because that is where the software is. The gimp sucks and don't get me started on the mess that is or the state of the audio/video stack etc etc.

Don't get me wrong, GNU/Linux is a great OS for supercomputers, servers or even embedded devices. I run it on my router (openwrt) on my phone (android) and on my NAS/LAMP server (Debian stable), but it'll never be my desktop OS. Every piece of opensource/GPL software i could possible want for desktop usage is alredy aavalible for Windows and even if it's not, there is always cygwin/virtualbox and about 800 other alternatives.

Im sorry to burst desktop Linux fanboys bubble but the "year of Linux on the desktop" is never ever going to happen. /ENDRANT

how about an update?

I stumbled upon this and wasn't surprised with what I saw. I've been using various distro's over the years and each have their merits, as does the various versions of windows. I now have Ubuntu 11.10 on one laptop and Windows 7 on another and am pleased with both, my windows 7 machine seems to be a little more reliable but it's probably down to hardware support. Any chance TuxRadar would consider a rematch? I think updates on both platforms might yield interesting results!

Que valiosa Guia ♫

Muy buena comparacion de estos dos "Ubuntu y Window"
Se nota que Ubuntu no quiere quedarse atras claro está que window derrotó a sus demas competencias pero Ubuntu tiende a lanzar su nuevo software ejeje

Arriba Window 7 Ultimate jeje ‼


Boot time w 7 vs Ubuntu

I have tried the try out of Ubuntu, and i'm realy disapointed when you compare the speed, it could be that i'm runnaing Ubuntu from a disk, but even then, With Ubuntu 11.10 my pc has to boot in about 200S!!! and with windows 7 it only takes 15-20S


good article!

Richards benchmark

Here an AMD X2 64 dual core
HD 1TB Sata
Running Debian Sid

results, 285.70 ms

What the hell???

no really, what the hell is this shit???

Awesome Ubuntu

Awsome Awesome free Ubuntu

This seems about right,

This seems about right, except booting time. My Ubuntu boots about 2 to 3 times as fast as Windows 7.
I remember on my old laptop, Windows took about 8-12 minutes to load (about 6 to load desktop, and and 4 until the application starts), in contrast to 1 minute on Ubuntu!

Dash new Samsung Epic 4G lives up to its title

?> This is very interesting, You're a very skilled blogger.Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article. I wish to read even more things about it!I am quite sure I will learn many new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next!* Organisational development and organization coaching - feasibility research, improvement planning, marketing and advertising and fundraising methods, sustainability and session
?> Thank you for sharing excellent informations. Your web-site is very cool.I've been looking all over for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing.We're a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your website offered us with valuable info to work on.I need an expert in this space to resolve my problem. Maybe that is you!
?> F*ckin' remarkable issues here.One of several greatest issues in regards to the blogosphere is the exciting tidbits it is possible to pick up on nearly any topic. I'm a long-time fan (but not a fanatic) on the "Star Wars" movie franchise. Okay, exactly what does this need to do with airports? Stay with me here.Designer consignments are recognized year-round. Resale Riches provides the highest fee on designer cast-offs. Consignors get among 60% - 80% of the selling price.Needless to say, there are several far more Star Wars Lego sets. The 4 talked about right here are some of the bigger, much more complicated sets that mature kids and grownups would value and prefer to contain in their Lego or Star Wars collections.

PCjQu JlI ZqVr

I’ll be bookmarking this page for sure.

Test, just a test

Автор недоумок

Предоставляю услуги по взлому электронной почты.

Предоставляю услуги по взлому электронной почты.

Вы хотите проследить переписку Вашей жены (мужа), любовницы (любовника),
подруги (друга), недругов или конкурентов?
Мы можем Вам помочь!!! [1500 руб, 50$ - [2500руб, 80$ - [2000 руб, 65$ - [2000 руб, 65$ -
Пароль не меняю, хозяин ничего не заподозрит.
Сроки взлома от 10 мин до 3 дней.
Без предоплаты.
Оплата вебмани, яндекс.

Скайп: hackerpromail

смс биллинг

--- смс биллинг ---


個人の印は印と いう以外、その内容は更に幅広くて、すべて店名、部屋館、住所、封検、詩の言葉などは含まないものはありません。形式上です 篆書は主として、その他のフォントも採用があって、特に広範に新しく出土する甲の骨、封泥、陶印、レンガ、鼎イ族、泉を採択して文字を洗います。 方為主で形を印刷して、その他の楕円はしかし、長方形なども作者に従って選びます。これに加えて作者は個性的で一様でなくて、教養の深さはそれぞれ異なっていて、それによって形成各種 異なる特徴と流派、その中は齊白石で"の大胆にも独創を要して、長い年月"の古きを捨て新しきを立てるスローガンを超えるのは最もよく響きます。清末全部で生産する青田石、色は青を主として、黄、白くて、淡緑色で、薄くて緑で、黒くて褐色で、赤いオーソがあります。青田石初期と盛んな化石 名声を等しくして、生産高は寿 山に次いで、石質の精度はもとても大きい違いがあります。石質が丈夫で小さいのはかたくて、光沢は強くて、刻む時刀と石略作ざくざく音、 軽快な感があって、だからその時の篆刻のために材料の逸品を印刷します。その性質の最も良い者は照明のために凍って、特に清浄で、全透明。別にギンナンの青、黄色の青田、 があります白い青田、紫の青田など、皆上等な印の材料のため。清朝末期利者を追って、太い石は製造して胚を印刷して、鉄製のなべと砂を入れて怒るで炒めて、氷のひびを使用して、 それから黒色の水の中に青色のインク赤いことを入れてあるいはあるいは、色をひびに入らせて、ものともしないで“蛇の皮が凍る”と称します。しかし石一経は怒って炒めて脆くなって、 刻む時むいて裂けやすいです。その筋道は準備して、ペンを使って墨で刀を運んで、全て彼の書道と絵画の同一で豪放な風格。同時に中婦の人の像と陽文の青銅器の凸凹文字を印刷して、 といちばん陰文の字は皆面の“明月の前身”を印刷することと待って、同一の テーマをめぐって展開して、それぞれ毛が生えることがあって、このを章氏の夫人の気持ちの幾重にも重なり合うカナダにしのびます 深くて、そのためとても強い芸術の感化させる能力があります。

Today is a very good day and I'm in a good mood

I want to wish you good luck and all the best

drag racing virtual machines

i built up several virtual machines to drag race against each other. to the point of firefox loaded and ready to browse the net... windows shows the UI before it is finished loading is the reasoning for forcing a program to load for the drag racing. my results are gentoo 64 with systemd takes 13 seconds & windows xp takes 18.

and since vista, 7, and 8 are all slower than xp i didnt bother testing them. windows is buggy junk, and anyone who says otherwise is either ill informed or incompetent. 20 gigs to install windows 7 and have it do absolutely nothing, vs installing the entirety of linux shell commands in less than that space.

Thank you for the good writeup.

What necessary words... super, magnificent idea

Please update! :)

I would be glad if you could add Ubuntu and Kubuntu 13.04 to these graphs! Thanks :)

lvtrend.comlouboutins pas cher

|imperative that you} Padgett {and|as well as|and also|along with} Utz.<br /><br />"We {do|perform|carry out|accomplish} {as much|just as much|the maximum amount of|all the} {stuff|things|products|goods} {in|within|inside|throughout} {Missouri|Mo} {as we can|as possible},{"|Inch|Inches|In .} Padgett {said|stated|mentioned|explained}. "Our {flashlights|lights|torches} {and|as well as|and also|along with} {Christian Louboutin|Louboutin|Christian louboutin uk|Christian louboutin shoes} {Boots|Footwear|Boot styles|Shoes or boots} {Sale|Purchase|Selling|Sale made} {are|tend to be|are usually|are generally} {distributed|dispersed|sent #file_links<C>\Users\Administrator\Desktop\D1\key.txt,1,N]

Apple iPhone 5S

In a world where almost nothing is certain, this is basically certain: Apple will be having an event on September 10 where the company will announce two new iPhone models. Or so we think.

Despite CEO Tim Cook's pledge to double down on secrecy, it seems like we already know everything about what will be shown: from extremely detailed purported photos and teardowns of the external casing to color options, the iPhone 5S and the iPhone 5C seem inevitable. The rumors have been fast and furious, and increasingly seem to confirm a similar picture.

If rumors are true, Apple is set to bifurcate the new iPhone lineup into two lines: a more budget-targeted, plastic-backed, candy-colored "5C," and the higher-end iPhone 5S, which looks exactly the same to a casual eye as last year's iPhone 5.
i need it )

Sunny day is full day long cool


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Username:   Password: